State v. Galan
This text of 253 N.W.2d 386 (State v. Galan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, subd. 1, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum of 10 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence but contends that he should be granted a new trial because of the allegedly improper admission of certain rebuttal testimony, and because of an arguably improper statement by the prosecutor in his closing argument. Defendant, by his failure to object, waived these issues and accordingly we do not reach them.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 N.W.2d 386, 312 Minn. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-galan-minn-1977.