State v. Gakin
This text of 227 N.W.2d 387 (State v. Gakin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of aggravated robbery, Minn. St. 609.245, and sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of not to exceed 20 years’ imprisonment, contends upon this appeal from judgment of conviction that the evidence against him was insufficient as a matter of law. We do not believe that it would serve any useful purpose for us to summarize the evidence against defendant. For a full recitation of the facts, see the companion case of State v. Caldwell, 303 Minn. 297, 227 N. W. 2d 382 (1975). Suffice it to say, we have read the entire trial transcript carefully and have found that there is no merit to defendant’s contention.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 N.W.2d 387, 303 Minn. 554, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gakin-minn-1975.