State v. Gaither

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gaither

179 S.W.3d 314, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1746, 2005 WL 3159714

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2005·No. ED 85526·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony K. Gaither appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a -controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the .judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony K. Gaither appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a -controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the .judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Gaither, 179 S.W.3d 314, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1746, 2005 WL 3159714 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

179 S.W.3d 314 (State v. Gaither) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related