State v. Gaines

90 So. 2d 228, 265 Ala. 196, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 488
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedSeptember 6, 1956
Docket7 Div. 308
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 So. 2d 228 (State v. Gaines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gaines, 90 So. 2d 228, 265 Ala. 196, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 488 (Ala. 1956).

Opinion

GOODWYN, Justice.

On April 12, 1955, the State of Alabama made final two assessments of gasoline tax against J. O. Gaines, d/b/a Etowah Oil Company, appellee. The first of these assessments covered an alleged tax deficiency due for the period September 1, 1952, through August 31, 1953, for $164.82, and the second assessment covered the period from September 1,1953, through August 31, 1954, in the amount of $151.66.

On May 5, 1955, Gaines took an appeal from both assessments to the circuit court of Etowah County, in equity, under the statutory authority of Code 1940, Tit. 51, § 140. The court below, after taking testimony ore tenus, entered a final decree setting aside the final assessments. The appeal here is brought by the state from that decree.

During the period here involved Gaines was a “distributor”, licensed and bonded in accordance with Code 1940, Tit. 51, § 667 and § 670, who purchased bulk quantities of gasoline from the Arkansas Fuel Corporation at its terminal near Birmingham and transported the gasoline in his own tank trucks to his leased tanks in Gadsden. On some occasions delivery would be made from these tank trucks to service stations along the route from Birmingham to Gadsden, but, generally the gasoline was transferred to one of three bulk tanks from whence it was withdrawn for delivery to retail dealers.

The alleged deficiencies resulted from “inventory losses” rather than “actual losses”, that is, the loss was not traceable directly to fire, rupture of tanks, etc., but was an “unexplained loss”, that is, not the result of any particular incident which could be pointed out with certainty as to cause.

The state’s audit indicated that, during the first period, the state tax of six cents a gallon had not been paid on some 8,309 gallons of gasoline received by Gaines but not accounted for, and that during the second period the tax had not been paid on some 7,200 gallons received but not accounted for. It appears to be the policy of the state department of revenue to allow one-half of one per cent of the total gallons handled as a maximum for “inventory loss”. Hence after deducting this maximum allowance, the assessments, above noted, were made.

As we understand the case, the ultimate and decisive question presented is whether an Alabama distributor of gasoline is required to pay the state gasoline tax on gasoline received and stored by him but not withdrawn from storage. In other words, is a distributor chargeable with the tax on gasoline stored by him but not withdrawn for sale or use because lost through evaporation, shrinkage, leakage, or other cause? The answer to the question rests on ascertainment of the legislative intendment in enacting §§ 646 to 649, 651, 660, 666, 667 and 670, Tit. 51, Code 1940, as amended. These sections have a history of amendments which show, we think, a clear legislative intent that the amount of the tax is to be computed on the basis of withdrawals from storage rather than on the amount stored, the tax being placed on the consumer, with the distributor acting as the agent of the state for the collection and payment of the tax to the state.

The several statutory provisions, as they existed during the periods with which we are concerned, provided, to the extent here pertinent, as follows:

“§ 646. Definitions.— * * * The term ‘distributor’ shall include any person who engages in the selling of gasoline in this state by wholesale domestic trade, but shall not apply to any transaction of such distributor in interstate commerce. The word ‘refiner’ shall include any person who manufactures, distills, blends, compounds or mixes any one or more products in the production of a liquid [198]*198motor fuel as herein defined. The term ‘retail dealer’ shall include any person herein defined as distributor who is also engaged in the selling of gasoline in this state at any place in this state in broken quantities. The term ‘storer’ as herein used shall include any person who ships or causes to be shipped or receives, • gasoline into this state in any quantities, and stores the same in any manner and withdraws or uses the same for any purpose. * * * The term ‘user’ as herein used shall include any person who uses or consumes gasoline in this state in any manner or for any purpose. Provided, however, the term ‘user’ is not to include any refiner who has a refinery or refineries located within the state of Alabama, and when using gasoline in the manufacturing or refining process, or any person who holds a federal permit to blend motor fuels under the federal law and statutes, and who pays the federal excise tax on such motor fuels directly to the federal government, when such person uses gasoline in this state in such blending process.” § 646 was amended in 1953 by Act No. 772, appvd. Sept. 18, 1953, Acts 1953, p. 1036, but not so as to affect the quoted portion.
“§ 647. Exise tax levied; use of the net proceeds thereof and method of allocation and distribution; distributor, dealer, etc., to add tax to price. —(a) Every distributor, refiner, retail dealer, storer, or user of gasoline shall collect and pay over to the state department of revenue an excise tax of six [now seven] cents per gallon upon the selling, use or consumption, distributing, storing, or withdrawal from storage in this state for any use, gasoline as defined or otherwise referred to in Article 5 of Title 51, Code of Alabama 1940, and as amended; provided, that where the excise tax of six cents per gallon upon the sale, use or consumption, distribution, storage, withdrawal from storage in this State of such gasoline shall have been paid to the state by a distributor, refiner, or by any retail dealer, storer, or user, such payments shall be sufficient, the intent being that the tax shall be paid to the State but once, (b) The State Department of Revenue is hereby authorized to issue to the United States certificates of exemption, upon forms prescribed by the Department for use by the United States in purchasing gasoline within the State of Alabama and which is paid for by the United States. Any person in reporting and paying the tax to the Department may deduct the number of gallons of gasoline sold to the United States, as shown by such certificate of exemption duly executed by the United States and filed with such report; and the Department is authorized to adopt rules and regulations with respect to the issuance and use of such certificates. * * * (d) Every distributor, refiner, retail dealer, or storer of gasoline shall add the amount of the excise tax levied and assessed herein to the price of the gasoline, it being the purpose and intent of this provision that the tax levied is in fact a levy on the consumer or user with the distributor, refiner, retail dealer, or storer, or in the case of a licensed user, acting merely as an agent of the State for the collection and payment of the tax to the State.” [Emphasis supplied.]

[Subsection (d) was added by amendment in 1949, Act No. 72, appvd. June 14, 1949, Acts 1949, p. 98, and Act. No. 649, appvd. Sept. 19, 1949, Acts 1949, p. 998. § 647 was further amended in 1953, Act No. 772, appvd. Sept. 18, 1953, Acts 1953, p. 1036, but not so as to affect the quoted portion of said section, and further amended in 1955, Act No. 44, appvd. Feb. 24, 1955, Acts 1955, 1st Ex.Sess., [199]*199Vol. I, p. 73, increasing the tax from six to seven cents per gallon but not otherwise affecting the quoted portion.]

Section 648, as amended by Act No. 649, appvd. Sept. 19, 1949, Acts 1949, p.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burchfield v. Horne
92 So. 2d 433 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 So. 2d 228, 265 Ala. 196, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gaines-ala-1956.