State v. Gage

53 A.D.2d 794, 385 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13590
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 18, 1974 in Albany County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The plaintiff brought the instant action to recover damages pursuant to sections 385 and 393 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law for damage to a highway bridge [795]*795which was struck by a large electric pump motor being transported on a flat-bed tractor trailer owned by appellant Pacific Intermountain Express Co. and operated by appellant Bernard Gage. Special Term, in granting summary judgment, concluded that there was no triable factual issue that appellants’ "vehicle inclusive of its load was in height in excess of the statutory maximum 13 and one-half feet” and that appellants, therefore, were absolutely liable. We concur (New York State Thruway Auth. v Maislin Bros. Transp., 35 AD2d 301). Appellants attempt to produce factual issues, but it is undisputed that the bridge was struck and clear that it was higher than 13.5 feet above the road. We find no merit in appellants contention that statutory civil liability is limited to unloaded vehicles higher than 13 feet (see New York State Thruway Auth. v Maislin Bros. Transp., supra). Order affirmed, with costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gage, 53 A.D.2d 794, 385 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

53 A.D.2d 794 (State v. Gage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.
212 A.D.2d 38 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)