State v. G. A. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. G. A. K.

348 P.3d 1192, 270 Or. App. 654, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 511

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 29, 2015

Docket13ME025; A156216

StatusPublished

This text of 348 P.3d 1192 (State v. G. A. K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. G. A. K., 348 P.3d 1192, 270 Or. App. 654, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 511 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She argues that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She argues that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 P.3d 1192, 270 Or. App. 654, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-g-a-k-orctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack