State v. Funches

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Funches

140 So. 3d 1165, 2014 La. LEXIS 1626, 2014 WL 2816019

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 20, 2014·No. No. 2013-KP-1479·Published

Opinions

In re Funches, Arthur; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 43263.

L Denied. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroac[1166] tively in relator’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214, 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014).

JOHNSON, C.J., dissents and would grant the writ and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Funches, Arthur; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 43263.

L Denied. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroac[1166] tively in relator’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214, 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014).

JOHNSON, C.J., dissents and would grant the writ and assigns reasons.

State v. Funches, 140 So. 3d 1165, 2014 La. LEXIS 1626, 2014 WL 2816019 (La. 2014).

Pincite

140 So. 3d 1165 (State v. Funches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related