Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. Funches

State v. Funches

140 So. 3d 1165, 2014 La. LEXIS 1626, 2014 WL 2816019
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 20, 2014
DocketNo. 2013-KP-1479
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 1165 (State v. Funches) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Funches, 140 So. 3d 1165, 2014 La. LEXIS 1626, 2014 WL 2816019 (La. 2014).

Opinions

In re Funches, Arthur; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 43263.

L Denied. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroac[1166]*1166tively in relator’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13), 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2663, 189 L.Ed.2d 214, 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014).

JOHNSON, C.J., dissents and would grant the writ and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
State v. Tate
130 So. 3d 829 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2013)
Tate v. Louisiana
134 S. Ct. 2663 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 3d 1165, 2014 La. LEXIS 1626, 2014 WL 2816019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-funches-la-2014.