State v. Fultz

864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 1993 WL 453621
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 9, 1993
DocketNo. 63117
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 864 S.W.2d 434 (State v. Fultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fultz, 864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 1993 WL 453621 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree drug trafficking, § 195.223, RSMo Supp.1992. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a term of sixteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit.- An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamont A. Fultz v. Carl White
107 F.3d 875 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 1993 WL 453621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fultz-moctapp-1993.