State v. Fultz

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fultz

864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 1993 WL 453621

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. No. 63117·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree drug trafficking, § 195.223, RSMo Supp.1992. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a term of sixteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit.- An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree drug trafficking, § 195.223, RSMo Supp.1992. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a term of sixteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit.- An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).

State v. Fultz, 864 S.W.2d 434, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 1993 WL 453621 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

864 S.W.2d 434 (State v. Fultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related