State v. Fulton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Fulton

793 N.E.2d 483, 99 Ohio St. 3d 475

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 27, 2003

DocketNo. 2003-0953

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 793 N.E.2d 483 (State v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fulton, 793 N.E.2d 483, 99 Ohio St. 3d 475 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified conflict is accepted, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. O’Connor, J., concurs in judgment based only on stare decisis. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents for the reasons stated in Judge Grady’s dissenting opinion in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified conflict is accepted, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. O’Connor, J., concurs in judgment based only on stare decisis. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents for the reasons stated in Judge Grady’s dissenting opinion in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

793 N.E.2d 483, 99 Ohio St. 3d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fulton-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack