State v. Fulton

351 S.W.3d 289, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1469, 2011 WL 5335468
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 8, 2011
DocketWD 72722
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 351 S.W.3d 289 (State v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fulton, 351 S.W.3d 289, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1469, 2011 WL 5335468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Senequa Fulton challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction on one count of forgery. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mosier v. State
351 S.W.3d 289 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
351 S.W.3d 289, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1469, 2011 WL 5335468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fulton-moctapp-2011.