State v. Fuller

518 A.2d 122, 1986 Me. LEXIS 917
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 3, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 518 A.2d 122 (State v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fuller, 518 A.2d 122, 1986 Me. LEXIS 917 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Joel Fuller appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Waldo County, entered on a jury verdict of guilty of murder, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 201(1)(A) (1983), and of robbery with the use of a firearm against a person, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 651(1)(D), 1252(5) (1983). Fuller challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Examining the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we hold that the jury rationally could have found beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgments affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 A.2d 122, 1986 Me. LEXIS 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fuller-me-1986.