State v. Fuller
This text of 109 P. 257 (State v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny and sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary' for twelve years. A motion for a new trial was made and denied. The appeal is from the judgment and order denying a new trial.
The errors assigned go to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and the admission of certain evidence over the objection of counsel for defendant, and the refusal to strike out certain evidence on motion of defendant.
As to the assignment of error in regard to the sufficiency of the evidence, we find upon a careful examination of the evidence that it is amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. Upon the other errors assigned, we find no error in the admission of the testimony ref erred to in said assignments, and no error in the refusal of the court to strike out certain of the evidence on the motion of counsel for the defendant.
The judgment must therefore be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 P. 257, 18 Idaho 372, 1910 Ida. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fuller-idaho-1910.