State v. Fuller
This text of 887 So. 2d 1236 (State v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
David Allen FULLER, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
*1237 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Kellie A. Nielen, Assistant Attorney General and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Heather M. Gray, Riverview, FL, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The State of Florida petitions for review of Fuller v. State, 867 So.2d 469 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), which certified conflict with the decision in Davis v. State, 710 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Although we have jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., given the First District's recent decision in Kiedrowski v. State, 876 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), which followed Fuller and distinguished Davis, we conclude that no actual conflict exists and decline to exercise our discretion to review the case.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
887 So. 2d 1236, 2004 WL 2363724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fuller-fla-2004.