State v. Fulks

428 S.W.3d 704, 2014 WL 1478111, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 421
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 2014·No. No. ED 99225·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dawn Fulks (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found her guilty of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, and making a false report. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in: (1) denying Defendant’s motion to suppress statements; (2) denying Defendant’s motion for acquittal on the armed criminal action count; and (3) submitting a verdict director on murder in the second degree based on the underlying felony of stealing a motor vehicle.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential [705] value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fulks, 428 S.W.3d 704, 2014 WL 1478111, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

428 S.W.3d 704 (State v. Fulks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.