State v. Fulks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Fulks

899 So. 2d 1243, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5446, 2005 WL 906163

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2005·No. Nos. 4D03-4783, 4D03-4994·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the downward departure sentence imposed pursuant to section 921.0026(2)(j), Florida Statutes (2002). On the cross-appeal, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal on the burglary/battery charge. In the light most favorable to the state, the evidence supported the conclusion that Fulks had passed the “boiling point” by the time he entered his estranged wife’s apartment. Based on the request for relief in Fulks’s brief on the cross-appeal, we do not reach the other issues on the cross-appeal, and affirm.

WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the downward departure sentence imposed pursuant to section 921.0026(2)(j), Florida Statutes (2002). On the cross-appeal, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal on the burglary/battery charge. In the light most favorable to the state, the evidence supported the conclusion that Fulks had passed the “boiling point” by the time he entered his estranged wife’s apartment. Based on the request for relief in Fulks’s brief on the cross-appeal, we do not reach the other issues on the cross-appeal, and affirm.

WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

State v. Fulks, 899 So. 2d 1243, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5446, 2005 WL 906163 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

899 So. 2d 1243 (State v. Fulks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.