State v. FRUITS

345 S.W.3d 896, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2011 WL 3667457
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 23, 2011
DocketWD 71785
StatusPublished

This text of 345 S.W.3d 896 (State v. FRUITS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. FRUITS, 345 S.W.3d 896, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2011 WL 3667457 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Dustin J. Fruits appeals four convictions: second-degree assault -with vehicular injury, resisting arrest, driving while license revoked, and careless and imprudent driving. He claims the trial court plainly erred in admitting a laboratory report and blood test evidence because the chain of custody was not established. Mr. Fruits also contends that the evidence sustaining the driving while license revoked conviction was insufficient.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hrw v. Lmm
345 S.W.3d 896 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 S.W.3d 896, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2011 WL 3667457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fruits-moctapp-2011.