State v. FRUITS
345 S.W.3d 896, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2011 WL 3667457
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Dustin J. Fruits appeals four convictions: second-degree assault -with vehicular injury, resisting arrest, driving while license revoked, and careless and imprudent driving. He claims the trial court plainly erred in admitting a laboratory report and blood test evidence because the chain of custody was not established. Mr. Fruits also contends that the evidence sustaining the driving while license revoked conviction was insufficient.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. FRUITS, 345 S.W.3d 896, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2011 WL 3667457 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
345 S.W.3d 896 (State v. FRUITS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hrw v. Lmm
345 S.W.3d 896 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)