State v. Fruge
174 So. 2d 131, 247 La. 720
This text of 174 So. 2d 131 (State v. Fruge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Fruge, 174 So. 2d 131, 247 La. 720 (La. 1965).
Opinion
In re: Jack C. Fruge and Elouise Stegall applying for writs of certiorari (review), prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.
Writ refused. This court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction and interfere with orderly proceedings in the trial court, particularly where applicants have an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of a conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 So. 2d 131, 247 La. 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fruge-la-1965.