State v. Fruetel

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Fruetel

629 So. 2d 102, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1941, 1993 WL 517385

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 16, 1993

DocketNo. 81165

StatusPublished

This text of 629 So. 2d 102 (State v. Fruetel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fruetel, 629 So. 2d 102, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1941, 1993 WL 517385 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in Fruetel v. State, 609 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of certified conflict. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The decision under review is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI