State v. Fruetel

629 So. 2d 102, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1941, 1993 WL 517385
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 16, 1993·No. No. 81165·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in Fruetel v. State, 609 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of certified conflict. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The decision under review is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fruetel, 629 So. 2d 102, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1941, 1993 WL 517385 (Fla. 1993).

629 So. 2d 102 (State v. Fruetel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munoz v. State
629 So. 2d 90 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Fruetel v. State
609 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)