State v. Frost
This text of 72 Tenn. 735 (State v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Grand Jury of Shelby County reported the bond of J. E. Erost, a Constable of said county, as being insufficient. Citation was issued to strengthen and increase his bond or show cause why his office should not be declared vacant.
He appeared before the Court, gave a satisfactory bond and the proceedings were dismissed at the cost of the county.
The Attorney-General moved to tax a fee of two dollars and fifty cents in his favor. The motion was disallowed by L. B. Horrigan, J., presiding, and the Attorney-General- appealed to this Court.
Opinion by the CourtThe judgment of the Court- below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 Tenn. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frost-tenn-1880.