State v. Frost
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Frost, 2025-Ohio-2557.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
BUTLER COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, :
Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2025-03-029
: DECISION AND - vs - JUDGMENT ENTRY : 7/21/2025
ROGER L. FROST, :
Appellant. :
CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2023-12-1868
Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Willa Concannon, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Law Office of John H. Forg, and John H. Forg III, for appellant.
_ _ DECISION
Per Curiam.
{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
appellant, Roger L. Frost, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of
proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and
upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. Butler CA2025-03-029
{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record
from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the
rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists four
potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Id. at 744. (3) requests that this
court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from
prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests
permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly
frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been
served upon appellant.
{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response
having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error
prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel
for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed
for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
_ ______________ JUDGMENT ENTRY
The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
-2- Butler CA2025-03-029
It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Butler County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Decision and Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.
Costs to be taxed to appellant.
/s/ Robert A. Hendrickson, Presiding Judge
/s/ Robin N. Piper, Judge
/s/ Mike Powell, Judge
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 Ohio 2557 (State v. Frost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.