State v. Frommelt
837 P.2d 564, 115 Or. App. 384, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1764
Opinion
The state concedes that the trial court erred when it ordered defendant to submit to breath tests at the request of a probation officer but failed to require that the officer first have reasonable grounds to believe that the test would disclose evidence of a probation violation. State v. Leen, 113 Or App 595, 832 P2d 49 (1992); State v. Robertson, 113 Or App 467, 833 P2d 326 (1992); State v. Hagger, 107 Or App 251, 810 P2d 1356 (1991). We accept the concession.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Frommelt, 837 P.2d 564, 115 Or. App. 384, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1764 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
837 P.2d 564 (State v. Frommelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hagger
810 P.2d 1356 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Robertson
833 P.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Leen
832 P.2d 49 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)