State v. FROLAND

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. FROLAND

949 A.2d 844, 195 N.J. 413

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. FROLAND. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 N.J. 186 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 2008·No. M-827 September Term 2007, 59,264·Published

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the motion for clarification is granted, and it is further ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court (slip op. at 22) is modified, with new text indicated by underscore, as follows:

⅜ ⅜ ⅜

VII

The judgment of the Appellate Division affirming the kidnapping convictions is reversed. The matter is remanded to the trial judge for proceedings consistent with the principles to which we have adverted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ORDERED that the motion for clarification is granted, and it is further ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court (slip op. at 22) is modified, with new text indicated by underscore, as follows:

⅜ ⅜ ⅜

VII

The judgment of the Appellate Division affirming the kidnapping convictions is reversed. The matter is remanded to the trial judge for proceedings consistent with the principles to which we have adverted.

State v. FROLAND, 949 A.2d 844, 195 N.J. 413 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

949 A.2d 844 (State v. FROLAND) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.