State v. Frohlich
This text of 2022 ND 121 (State v. Frohlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT JUNE 8, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 121
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jeremy John Frohlich, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210303
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia M. Feland, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joshua A. Amundson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Frohlich No. 20210303
[¶1] Jeremy Frohlich appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition. Frohlich argues the district court erred in finding him competent to stand trial. Two doctors testified relating to Frohlich’s competency to stand trial at an August 2020 competency hearing. The district court made credibility findings after reviewing the testimony of both doctors. Those findings are not clearly erroneous and we are not left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake was made. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 121, 975 N.W.2d 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frohlich-nd-2022.