State v. Fristoe

219 S.W.3d 288, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2007 WL 1118423
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 17, 2007
DocketWD 66915
StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W.3d 288 (State v. Fristoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fristoe, 219 S.W.3d 288, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2007 WL 1118423 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

Joyce Fristoe (“Fristoe”) appeals her conviction, following a jury trial, for possession of a controlled substance in violation of Missouri Revised Statutes, section 195.202. 1 On appeal, Fristoe challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish her knowledge of the presence and nature of a rock of crack cocaine recovered from her car. Immediately before her arrest, she was sitting in the passenger’s seat of her ear, on top of the cocaine at issue. Having reviewed the record on appeal and finding no error, this court affirms the judgment of the trial court. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to Missouri Revised Statutes, 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Tp
219 S.W.3d 288 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W.3d 288, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2007 WL 1118423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fristoe-moctapp-2007.