State v. Friscia
This text of 701 So. 2d 669 (State v. Friscia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s determination to suppress a vial seized during a pat-down search of Peter Friscia’s person. See Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993); Jordan v. State, 664 So.2d 272 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Doctor v. State, 596 So.2d 442, 445 (Fla.1992); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); Smith v. State, 279 So.2d 27 (Fla.1973).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
701 So. 2d 669, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13311, 1997 WL 731571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-friscia-fladistctapp-1997.