State v. Friscia
701 So. 2d 669, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13311, 1997 WL 731571
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s determination to suppress a vial seized during a pat-down search of Peter Friscia’s person. See Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993); Jordan v. State, 664 So.2d 272 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Doctor v. State, 596 So.2d 442, 445 (Fla.1992); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); Smith v. State, 279 So.2d 27 (Fla.1973).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Friscia, 701 So. 2d 669, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13311, 1997 WL 731571 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
701 So. 2d 669 (State v. Friscia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Minnesota v. Dickerson
508 U.S. 366 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Smith v. State
279 So. 2d 27 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Jordan v. State
664 So. 2d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Doctor v. State
596 So. 2d 442 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Brown v. State
428 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)