State v. Fries

211 N.W. 310, 169 Minn. 320, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1457
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 10, 1926·No. No. 25,703.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dibell, J.

There was evidence on the part of two police officers that they saw the defendant, who was convicted of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor, carry across a street at the carnival grounds in Minneapolis and deposit in an automobile a bottle, the contents of which were shown sufficiently though not absolutely to be intoxicating liquor. Opposed was evidence given by the defendant and his brother that there was not such transportation. The issue was one of fact determinable either for or against the defendant, The finding Of the trial court is sustained, and there is no room for profitable discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fries, 211 N.W. 310, 169 Minn. 320, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1457 (Mich. 1926).

211 N.W. 310 (State v. Fries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thornson
212 N.W. 591 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)