State v. FRIEDEMANN

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. FRIEDEMANN

988 A.2d 563, 201 N.J. 142, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 357

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 14, 2010

DocketM-409 September Term 2009, 064979

StatusPublished

This text of 988 A.2d 563 (State v. FRIEDEMANN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. FRIEDEMANN, 988 A.2d 563, 201 N.J. 142, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 357 (N.J. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted in part, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, to reconsider its order denying defendant’s applications to proceed as an indigent, for the assignment of counsel on appeal, and for free transcripts; and for a statement of reasons for its decision in light of Rule 2:7-2(b), Rule 3:4-2(c), Rule 7.3-2(b), and other relevant considerations.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted in part, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, to reconsider its order denying defendant’s applications to proceed as an indigent, for the assignment of counsel on appeal, and for free transcripts; and for a statement of reasons for its decision in light of Rule 2:7-2(b), Rule 3:4-2(c), Rule 7.3-2(b), and other relevant considerations.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

988 A.2d 563, 201 N.J. 142, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-friedemann-nj-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack