State v. Frieberg

49 Ohio St. (N.S.) 585

Opinion

By the; Couet:

The principal objections urged to the indictment are, (1), that three distinct offenses are charged in one count; (2), the indictment fails to state what constituted the offal, filth and noxious matter put in the stream; and (8), the indictment does not state what quantity of any of these substances was put in the stream.

We think neither point well taken. The indictment is in due form, and the motion should have been overruled.

Exceptions sustained.