State v. Frey

183 P.3d 190, 344 Or. 420
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMay 1, 2008
DocketS055946
StatusPublished

This text of 183 P.3d 190 (State v. Frey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Frey, 183 P.3d 190, 344 Or. 420 (Or. 2008).

Opinion

183 P.3d 190 (2008)
344 Or. 420

State
v.
Frey.

No. (S055946.)

Supreme Court of Oregon.

May 1, 2008.

CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS, MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS.

Upon consideration by the court. Relator's petition for alternative writ of mandamus is allowed. The court determines that, pursuant to ORS 34.160, a peremptory writ is appropriate. Therefore, the State Court Administrator is directed to issue immediately a peremptory writ of mandamus. Peremptory writ issued May 1, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 34.160
Oregon § 34.160

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 P.3d 190, 344 Or. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frey-or-2008.