State v. Frey

528 S.W.3d 479
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 2017·No. WD 79722·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Steven Frey, Jr., appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of first-degree statutory sodomy, § 566.062, and second-degree statutory sodomy, § 566.064, for which he was sentenced by the court as a persistent felony offender to concurrent terms of twenty-five and fifteen years, respectively. Frey brings two points on appeal. First, he argues that the court erred in admitting his statement to Officer Swanson because it was taken in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Second, he argues that the court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial after a State’s witness mentioned that Frey had been in jail on the charges. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.26(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Frey, 528 S.W.3d 479 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

528 S.W.3d 479 (State v. Frey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)