State v. . Freshwater

111 S.E. 161, 183 N.C. 762, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 361
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1922·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Adams, J..

The ordinance is plainly in conflict with C. S., 2599 and 2618. Section 2601 inhibits the governing body of-a municipal corporation from passing any ordinance contrary to the provisions of the chapter in which these sections are found. But without regard to this statutory inhibition, the conflict would be fatal. Municipal ordinances are ordained for local purposes in the exercise of a delegated legislative function, and must harmonize with the general laws of the State. In case *763 of conflict tbe ordinance must yield to tbe State law. Tbe motion to dismiss tbe action should therefore have been allowed. Washington v. Hammond, 76 N. C., 33; S. v. Langston, 88 N. C., 693; S. v. Brittain, 89 N. C., 574; S. v. Keith, 94 N. C., 933; S. v. Austin, 114 N. C., 855; S. v. McCoy, 116 N. C., 1059; S. v. Black, 150 N. C., 866. On tbe defendant’s motion tbe judgment is reversed, and this will be certified.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Freshwater, 111 S.E. 161, 183 N.C. 762, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 361 (N.C. 1922).

111 S.E. 161 (State v. . Freshwater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melkonian v. Board of Adjustment
355 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
Greene v. City of Winston-Salem
213 S.E.2d 231 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
Upchurch v. Hudson Funeral Home, Inc.
140 S.E.2d 17 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
In Re Markham
131 S.E.2d 329 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Davis v. City of Charlotte
89 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Lee v. Robertson Chemical Corp.
50 S.E.2d 181 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Eldridge v. . Mangum
5 S.E.2d 721 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Sasseen
175 S.E. 142 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Stallings
126 S.E. 187 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)