State v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Freeman

938 N.E.2d 363, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1460

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 2010

Docket2010-1671

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 938 N.E.2d 363 (State v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Freeman, 938 N.E.2d 363, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 92809, 2010-Ohio-3714. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I, and briefing shall proceed as to Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. IV; cause held as to that proposition of law for the decision in 2009-1997, State v. Hodge, Hamilton App. No. C-080968; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. VI; cause held as to that proposition of law for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap, Cuyahoga App. No. 91165, 2009-Ohio-134; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap. Pfeifer, J., dissents as to Proposition of Law No. VT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI