State v. Freeman.
42 S.E. 575, 131 N.C. 725, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 351
Opinion
Indictment for burning a barn with livestock, under The Code, Sec. 985 (6). Tbe only evidence against the defendant was- threats made by him, without any evidence whatever connecting him with the execution of said threats, or with the offence charged. The Judge should, as prayed, have withdrawn the case from the jury. State v. Rhodes, 111 N. C., 647, is exactly in point. Indeed, the Attorney-General, witb commendable frankness, conceded as much on the argument here.
Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Freeman., 42 S.E. 575, 131 N.C. 725, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 351 (N.C. 1902).
42 S.E. 575 (State v. Freeman.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Needham
71 S.E.2d 29 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
State v. Jarrell
65 S.E.2d 304 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)