State v. Freeman.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Freeman.

42 S.E. 575, 131 N.C. 725, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 351

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 28, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 S.E. 575 (State v. Freeman.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Freeman., 42 S.E. 575, 131 N.C. 725, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 351 (N.C. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Indictment for burning a barn with livestock, under The Code, Sec. 985 (6). Tbe only evidence against the defendant was- threats made by him, without any evidence whatever connecting him with the execution of said threats, or with the offence charged. The Judge should, as prayed, have withdrawn the case from the jury. State v. Rhodes, 111 N. C., 647, is exactly in point. Indeed, the Attorney-General, witb commendable frankness, conceded as much on the argument here.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Indictment for burning a barn with livestock, under The Code, Sec. 985 (6). Tbe only evidence against the defendant was- threats made by him, without any evidence whatever connecting him with the execution of said threats, or with the offence charged. The Judge should, as prayed, have withdrawn the case from the jury. State v. Rhodes, 111 N. C., 647, is exactly in point. Indeed, the Attorney-General, witb commendable frankness, conceded as much on the argument here.

Error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 S.E. 575, 131 N.C. 725, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-freeman-nc-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack