State v. Freeman

599 So. 2d 1053, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875, 1992 WL 131815
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1992·No. No. 91-2402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the information as being overly broad as to the time frame charged. See State v. Jones, 539 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the state filing a new information with the time frame more narrowly drawn.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, DELL and POLEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Freeman, 599 So. 2d 1053, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875, 1992 WL 131815 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 1053 (State v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
539 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)