State v. Freeman
599 So. 2d 1053, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875, 1992 WL 131815
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the information as being overly broad as to the time frame charged. See State v. Jones, 539 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the state filing a new information with the time frame more narrowly drawn.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Freeman, 599 So. 2d 1053, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875, 1992 WL 131815 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 1053 (State v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jones
539 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)