Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Freeman

State v. Freeman

34 A.3d 395, 303 Conn. 922, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 12, 2012
DocketSC 18909
StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.3d 395 (State v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Freeman, 34 A.3d 395, 303 Conn. 922, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 36 (Colo. 2012).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 438 (AC 32422), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*923 Decided January 12, 2012 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18909. Lisa A. Vanderhoof, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Linda Currie-Zeffiro, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it reopened a pretrial suppression hearing and permitted the state to present additional evidence?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Freeman
33 A.3d 256 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.3d 395, 303 Conn. 922, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-freeman-conn-2012.