State v. Freeman

279 P.2d 447, 78 Ariz. 291, 1955 Ariz. LEXIS 194
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 1955·No. No. 1062·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PHELPS, Justice.

With the exception that a different party defendant is involved and a different person alleged to have been defrauded and a different amount procured as a result thereof the information, the motion to quash, and the ruling of the trial court thereon are all identical with those set forth in State v. Freeman, 78 Ariz. 281, 279 P.2d 440, and the opinion therein applies with equal force to the instant case.

[292]*292It is therefore ordered that the order of the court to quash the information and directing the county attorney to initiate new proceedings before a justice of the peace is set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.

LA PRADE, C. J., and UDALL, WINDES, and STRUCKMEYER, Jr., JJ., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Freeman, 279 P.2d 447, 78 Ariz. 291, 1955 Ariz. LEXIS 194 (Ark. 1955).

279 P.2d 447 (State v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holden
352 P.2d 705 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1960)