State v. Freeland

558 So. 2d 204, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1837, 1990 WL 31538
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1990·No. No. 89-1340·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence and a cross-appeal from convictions. We find no merit in the cross-appeal but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. While the record is not crystal clear as to why the trial judge refused to score previous convictions for sale and possession of illegal drugs it could be that Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987) was improperly retroactively applied. State v. Glenn, 558 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990). Even if Carawan was applied, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the previous convictions for sale and possession involved a single quantity of drugs. If a downward departure was intended then written reasons were not given.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Freeland, 558 So. 2d 204, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1837, 1990 WL 31538 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 204 (State v. Freeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Buchanan
580 So. 2d 201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Lyons
578 So. 2d 489 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)