State v. Frederick

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Frederick

518 So. 2d 1127, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 11144, 1987 WL 34809

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 22, 1987·No. No. KA 87 1453·Published

Opinion

APPEAL DISMISSED: La.R.S. 44:3 C is not applicable to criminal discovery proceedings. Only final judgments are ap-pealable. La.C.Cr.P. art. 912 A. To allow an appeal of an interlocutory ruling in a criminal case would unduly delay the disposition of the criminal charges. The proper avenue of review is by application for supervisory writs. Since the present “appeal” does not comply with Rule 4, Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, it will not be considered as an application for writs. See State v. Clause, 486 So.2d 1206 at fn. 2 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

APPEAL DISMISSED: La.R.S. 44:3 C is not applicable to criminal discovery proceedings. Only final judgments are ap-pealable. La.C.Cr.P. art. 912 A. To allow an appeal of an interlocutory ruling in a criminal case would unduly delay the disposition of the criminal charges. The proper avenue of review is by application for supervisory writs. Since the present “appeal” does not comply with Rule 4, Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, it will not be considered as an application for writs. See State v. Clause, 486 So.2d 1206 at fn. 2 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986).

State v. Frederick, 518 So. 2d 1127, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 11144, 1987 WL 34809 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

518 So. 2d 1127 (State v. Frederick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related