State v. Frazier

2022 Ohio 2988
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2022·No. CA2022-05-035·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, :

Appellee, : CASE NO.CA2022-05-035

: DECISION

- vs - 8/29/2022 :

KHARI IYANI FRAZIER, :

Appellant. :

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 21CR38470

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Johnna M. Shia, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Khari Iyani Frazier, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of

Warren CA2022-05-035

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

M. POWELL, P.J., HENDRICKSON and PIPER, JJ., concur.

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: Khari Iyana Frazier, 377 Athens Way, Apartment 103, Nashville, Tennessee 37228.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Frazier, 2022 Ohio 2988 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).

2022 Ohio 2988 (State v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)