State v. Frazier

934 A.2d 635, 192 N.J. 593, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1267
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 2007·Published

Opinion

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted solely for the purpose of a summary remand to the post-conviction relief judge to determine factually the claim of defendant’s attorney that the trial judge uttered a remark in chambers evidencing bias; and it is further

ORDERED that the parties are to submit certifications from trial counsel that address defendant’s contentions; and it is further

ORDERED that if the certifications reflect a genuine issue of material fact, the post-conviction relief judge is to conduct an evidentiary hearing; and it is further

ORDERED that if the post-conviction relief judge determines that a biased remark in fact was uttered, the judge shall reconsider and decide the petition for post-conviction relief on the merits.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Frazier, 934 A.2d 635, 192 N.J. 593, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1267 (N.J. 2007).

934 A.2d 635 (State v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.