State v. Frazier
Opinion
The defendant’s exceptions are to decisions of the superior court upon questions of fact, and raise no questions of law. Dearborn, v. Newhall, 63 N. H. 301. The case differs from Winstow v. Smith, ante, 65, in that the court exercised his discretion, and, so far as appears, properly. It cannot be held as matter of law that the testimony contained in the affidavit submitted to the court outweighed all the other testimony that was before him, especially in view of its indefiniteness and the manner in which it was obtained.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
65 A. 297 (State v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.