State v. Frase

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Frase

717 N.E.2d 345, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3498

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 5, 1999

Docket99-1779

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 717 N.E.2d 345 (State v. Frase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Frase, 717 N.E.2d 345, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3498 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Licking App. No. 99CA32. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s denial of her motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial, and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(A)(4), apply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, [1413]*1413stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, suei sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Licking App. No. 99CA32. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s denial of her motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial, and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(A)(4), apply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, [1413]*1413stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, suei sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 N.E.2d 345, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frase-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack