State v. Franzese

580 A.2d 538, 23 Conn. App. 433, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 345
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided September 18, 1990·No. 9479; 9484·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc., publisher of The Advocate, a daily-newspaper with circulation in lower Fairfield County, and Cablevision of Connecticut Limited Partnership, operator of a television outlet serving the same area, were granted permission to intervene in this matter to object to the defendant’s motion to close further bail proceedings from the public and the news media. They take this appeal, pursuant to General Statutes § 51-164x, from the decision of the trial court granting closure.

We have considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and are satisfied that the standards enunciated in Press Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, 106 S. Ct. 2735, 92 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1986), apply. The defendant has failed to show that there is a substantial likelihood that irreparable damage to a fair trial will result from conducting public proceedings. Nor has he shown that alternatives to closure will not adequately protect his right to a fair trial, or that closure will be effective in protecting against the preceived harm.

The order of the trial court closing further bail proceedings is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Franzese, 580 A.2d 538, 23 Conn. App. 433, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 345 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

580 A.2d 538 (State v. Franzese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kelly
695 A.2d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1997)
Lorna J. Wendt v. Gary C. Wendt
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 3035 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Wendt v. Wendt
706 A.2d 1021 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
State v. Clein, No. Cr96-230423 (May 17, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4034-QQ (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)