State v. Franklin

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Franklin

914 N.E.2d 1063, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1422

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 2009·No. 2009-1227·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 08AP-900, 2009-Ohio-2664. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 08AP-900, 2009-Ohio-2664. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent.

State v. Franklin, 914 N.E.2d 1063, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

914 N.E.2d 1063 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related