State v. Franklin

804 N.E.2d 37, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1462
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 2004
Docket2002-1104
StatusPublished

This text of 804 N.E.2d 37 (State v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Franklin, 804 N.E.2d 37, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1462 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 19041, 2002-Ohio-2370. Reported at 98 Ohio St.3d 1422, 2003-Ohio-259, 782 N.E.2d 77. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellant’s pro se motion for reconsideration, motion for an evidentiary hearing, motion to compel discovery, and motion for appointment of expert assistance and funds for expert assistance. Whereas, appellant’s motion for reconsideration and related motions were not timely filed under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motions be, and hereby are, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
804 N.E.2d 37, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-franklin-ohio-2004.