State v. Franklin

307 N.W.2d 513, 209 Neb. 281, 1981 Neb. LEXIS 907
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 1981·No. 43652·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Krivosha, C.J.

*282 The appellant, Earl L. Franklin, appeals from a judgment based upon a conviction of guilt returned by a jury after trial. Franklin was convicted of the crimes of robbery and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. He was sentenced to a term of 4 to 6 years on the robbery charge and 2 to 4 years on the use of a firearm charge, to be served consecutively to the robbery sentence. Franklin raises but a single issue in this appeal. He maintains that a conviction for a crime which is based solely upon uncorroborated eyewitness identification is insufficient. The disposition of this case is governed by our opinion in State v. Ammons, 208 Neb. 812, 813-14, 305 N.W.2d 812, 814 (1981), wherein we reaffirmed our earlier position and said: “It has long been the rule in this state that except in certain crimes such as sexual assault, a conviction may rest upon the testimony of a single eyewitness.” Our holding in Ammons is dispositive of this appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Franklin, 307 N.W.2d 513, 209 Neb. 281, 1981 Neb. LEXIS 907 (Neb. 1981).

307 N.W.2d 513 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Davis
334 N.W.2d 450 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Jackson
308 N.W.2d 527 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)