State v. Franklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Franklin

342 S.W.3d 924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 895, 2011 WL 2534820

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Franklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 307 S.W.3d 205 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2011·No. WD 72998·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri appeals the trial court’s order granting Tyson Franklin’s motion to suppress evidence relating to a DWI charge. The trial court found that the arresting officer lacked probable cause at the time of the arrest to believe Franklin had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Because a published opinion would have no prece-

*925 dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16 (b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri appeals the trial court’s order granting Tyson Franklin’s motion to suppress evidence relating to a DWI charge. The trial court found that the arresting officer lacked probable cause at the time of the arrest to believe Franklin had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Because a published opinion would have no prece-

*925 dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16 (b).

State v. Franklin, 342 S.W.3d 924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 895, 2011 WL 2534820 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

342 S.W.3d 924 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.