State v. Frank

323 S.W.3d 84, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2010 WL 4075441
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2010·No. No. ED 93492·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antwone Frank (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a bench trial where he was convicted of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, Section 571.070 RSMo (2000), and one count of unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.030 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. Appellant raises two points on appeal, challenging the denial of his motions to suppress evidence and statements because he believes these items were obtained pursuant to an illegal search and-seizure.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal. We find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Frank, 323 S.W.3d 84, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2010 WL 4075441 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

323 S.W.3d 84 (State v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.