State v. Frank
This text of 23 La. Ann. 213 (State v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On an indictment for murder the defendant was tried and convicted of manslaughter, and, being sentenced to the Penitentiary ior ten years, he has appealed.
On a motion for new trial it was shown that there was a separation of the jury twice during the progress of the trial.. In capital cases it is well settled, that jurors are not permitted to separate, and that upon a separation misconduct and abusé will always be'presumed. State v. Hornsby, 8 R. 554; State v. Crosby, 4 An. 435; State v. Evans, 27 An. 321.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be sot aside and annulled, and that this case be remanded for new trial, and to be. proceeded in according to law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 La. Ann. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frank-la-1871.