State v. Francum

182 S.E.2d 275, 12 N.C. App. 37, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1274
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 14, 1971
DocketNo. 7128SC452
StatusPublished

This text of 182 S.E.2d 275 (State v. Francum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Francum, 182 S.E.2d 275, 12 N.C. App. 37, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1274 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s court-appointed counsel has made no assignments of error and states that the case is brought forward to seek such relief as the Court might find the appellant entitled. The purported appeal is from a judgment denying defendant relief under a paper writing which he labeled a “writ of habeas corpus” and which was treated as such by the able trial judge. Except in cases' involving the custody of minor children, an appeal does not lie from a judgment on return to a writ of habeas corpus. In re Wright, 8 N.C. App. 330, 174 S.E. 2d 27.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Brock and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Custody of Wright
174 S.E.2d 27 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 S.E.2d 275, 12 N.C. App. 37, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-francum-ncctapp-1971.